The Battle of Great Bridge; A
New Beginning for the Old Dominion
by Richard Podruchny
The Battle of Great Bridge, often referred to as the Second Battle of Bunker's
Hill, should stand out as one the defining moments of the American
Revolutionary War. Although this battle does not match the amount of troops or
casualties found in other engagements, nevertheless, its overall impact can no
longer be ignored. What elevates this particular battle is that numerous slaves
fought alongside the British in exchange for freedom, which openly contradicts
those Colonists preaching liberty, who owned slaves themselves. The outcome of
this battle would hold a dissimilar importance for the men who fought at Great
Bridge, where triumph for one side would prohibit liberty to the other. This
battle held the fate of Virginia and the rest of the Southern Colonies in the
balance.
Before the battle can be discussed, it is important for the reader to gain some
insight into what it was like in the Great Bridge area during the 1700's. Prior
to the American Revolution, settlers had been claiming land between the
Chesapeake Bay and the Albemarle Sound for at least a century or more. In
particular, Great Bridge stood on the Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River in
Virginia's Norfolk County, not far from the North Carolina border. Great Bridge
was a center of activity in marketing products of the forests and fields south
of the Chesapeake Bay. Great Bridge had developed markets for shingles, barrel
staves, and cypress and juniper headers. Pitch, tar and turpentine, which were
extracted from the many pine trees found in the area, were required for their
use in the building and upkeep of ships that were critical to the areas
economy.[1]
Even though the Great Bridge area was not lacking in the amount of forest
products being created, it was how to get these products to market that posed a
dilemma to the plantation and small farm owners. The Colonists in northeastern
North Carolina and southeastern Virginia depended on merchants and traders,
whose ships transported goods to England, New York, Boston, Charleston and the
West Indies. To get these goods to the merchants required getting them to their
shipping point, which was the Town of Norfolk, sited at the mouth of the
Elizabeth River on the Chesapeake Bay. Getting their goods to Norfolk, the
Colonists either shipped them overland, which was not very practical, or by
water. Both modes of shipping were rampant with problems, where the shallow
North Carolina sounds did not oblige vessels with much draft and the swamps,
low land and marshes of the area made road construction vastly complex.[2]
Eventually, the Colonists from Virginia and North Carolina border formed an
alliance in solving their shipping problem. The Colonists brought their goods
on flats and barges via the Albemarle and Currituck Sounds and the Northwest
River to landings at the southern end of the Great Road. Once there, they were
off-loaded to ox-drawn wagons for the trip to the Southern Branch of the
Elizabeth River, where they were either directly loaded onboard ships headed to
Norfolk or were stored in warehouses for impending delivery to Norfolk. As the
reader can notice, the Town of Norfolk has played a key role in getting the
Colonist's goods to markets abroad. Norfolk itself was established as a town
and port in 1705 and in later years it eventually became the Borough of Norfolk
due to the amount of commerce that was taking place.[3]
As it was mentioned in the previous paragraph, the Great Road at this time was
little more than a dirt trail. In some places, mainly low areas, logs were
placed horizontally along the line of travel forming a corduroy section of
road. The route of the Great Road followed what are today's Battlefield
Boulevard just north of the North Carolina border and the Northwest River to
Centerville Turnpike, along Centerville to Fentress Road, then to Mt. Pleasant
Road and west on that road to Battlefield and the Southern Branch of the
Elizabeth River.[4]
All of this commercial activity at the Southern Branch resulted in the
formation of a village. In 1686, the Norfolk County Court appointed Thomas Butt
to be Surveyor of Roads and assigned him the construction of a causeway over
the Southern Branch in order to connect the Great Road with a road just to the
north. His result was several small bridges linked to causeways with the "great
bridge" being the largest and farthest south. With the arrival of the
causeway-bridge crossing of the marshes and streams, the village ultimately
became known as Great Bridge. In 1775, the crossing over the Southern Branch
was a 40-foot span bridge that went through marshland. The tidal marsh extended
about 160 feet on either side of the waterway, and was constantly being filled
and drained with the tides. What the reader needs to keep in mind is that this
physical description of the bridge will play into the outcome of the battle
itself.[5]
Now that the reader has a better understanding of what it was like in the Great
Bridge area in the 1700's, we can now take a look at how the events unfolded
into the Battle of Great Bridge. The causes that seem to be a recurring theme
is the amount of discontent the Colonists placed with being taxed and in
Virginia it was no different. Even back in 1652 on Virginia's Eastern Shore
there were protests against imposed taxes. This principal sense of discontent
with the system of taxes flared up when George Grenville, Britain's Prime
Minister, pushed through the Sugar Act. At first, the Colonists saw this as
another measure that the British would not fully enforce. However, Grenville
intended that it should be enforced and revenue vessels were sent to guard the
coasts and customs officers were ordered to move against offenders. The
citizens of Norfolk were suddenly awoken to this realization when several
vessels were seized by Edward H. Moseley, surveyor of Elizabeth River and
public outrage over his actions forced him from his position. Therefore, in the
early years of the dispute with the British Government, Norfolk sided with the
colonial cause, since Grenville had affected the economy of the town when he
meddled with the West Indian trade.[6]
Now that the citizens of Norfolk County were already wary of Parliaments system
of taxation, this discontent flared into the open after the House of Burgesses,
which was in session in Williamsburg on May 26, 1765, received from their agent
in London a communiqué holding a copy of the Stamp Act Resolution passed by
Parliament. Virginians led the way in fighting for this burden of taxes to be
repealed, with the citizens of Norfolk and Princess Anne Counties and the
Borough of Norfolk first to protest. After several months of meetings, 57
patriots assembled on 31 March 1766 at the Norfolk County Courthouse and
organized The Sons of Liberty to draw up resolutions to protest the taxes.[7]
Although the citizens of Norfolk and Princess Anne Counties expressed their
anger against the Stamp Act, their prayers seemed to be answered when just six
weeks later, they were notified that the Stamp Act had been repealed. This
elation would turn to anger yet again when Parliament, led by Charles
Townshend, introduced new taxes on the colonies in the following year. In 1767,
Virginia was forbidden to issue paper money and the Townshend Revenue Act
imposed duties on glass, lead, paint and tea. The Boston Massacre in 1770 and
the Gaspee affair in 1772 further fueled the colonist's discontent. During this
time, the Boston Tea Party occurred in December of 1773, however, late in
August of 1774, Norfolk became shocked at the news that nine chests of tea had
arrived on the brigantine Mary and Jane. At a meeting in the
courthouse, it was collectively resolved that the tea must be sent back and the
merchants agreed not to take the delivery. As a result, Norfolk's version of
the Boston Tea Party ended peacefully.[8]
During this period of increased tension, the colonial governors of Virginia and
Massachusetts apparently became concerned about the patriot's stores of arms
and munitions at around similar times. In Massachusetts, Governor Gage
dispatched troops to destroy patriot munitions at Concord on the night of 18-19
April 1775, which resulted in the Battles of Lexington and Concord. On April
20, 1775, John Murray, Earl of Dunmore and Royal Governor of Virginia ordered
his troops to enter the Public Magazine at Williamsburg to seize 20 kegs of
gunpowder stored there.[9]
Even though tensions had drastically risen between Great Britain and the
Colonies, the citizens of Tidewater Virginia were divided in their loyalties to
Great Britain and Governor Dunmore. Merchants and owners of trading vessels had
their money tied to letters of credit, which were held by persons in England,
while the patriots had been handicapped in marketing and purchasing their goods
by numerous restrictions as well as the taxes imposed by the British
government. After the affair at the Public Magazine in Williamsburg, Governor
Dunmore began to fear for his life and in June 1775 he fled Williamsburg and
boarded the Royal William, where he sought refuge at the Gosport
Shipyard in Portsmouth. The owner of the shipyard, Andrew Sproule, was
intensely loyal to the crown and he welcomed the Governor and furnished
barracks for his men. Even though the Governor's troops were outnumbered, he
controlled all of the naval power in the area.[10]
On September 18, 1775, Virginia's Committee of Safety convened in Hanover Town
and their main business was the selection and commissioning of officers and the
decision was made to create two regiments in the colony. Colonel Patrick Henry
became commander of the First Regiment and Colonel William Woodford, commander
of the Second Regiment. The Committee of Safety wrestled with an insufficient
supply of arms and gunpowder, as well as the Virginia forces not being able to
control Governor Dunmore's activities around Gosport and in the Hampton Roads
area. An excellent example of this can be seen on September 30, 1775, where a
printer in Norfolk, John Holt, continued to compel the people not to give up
their freedom without a fight, however, he was silenced by a party of 17
British troops.[12] Residents protested and appealed to the Committee of Safety
for protection from the Governor's barbarous acts, nevertheless, Governor
Dunmore threatened to burn the town of Hampton after learning about the
resident's call for assistance.
At this point, Governor Dunmore and Virginia were now engaged in open warfare.
The famous minutemen of Virginia's upper counties were now concentrating at
Williamsburg in preparation for their advance on Norfolk. The patriots in
Norfolk and Princess Anne, under the leadership of Matthew Phripp and Colonel
Lawson, assembled in arms and situated themselves at Kemp's Landing, present
day Kempsville, and other strategic points. Many of the most dependable
patriots in Norfolk had already left to join the militia and a general exodus
of all except those loyal to the British now took place. For the next few days,
Church Street and the road to Great Bridge was crowded with fugitives, many of
them driving carts filled with household goods.[13]
Now that the Colonial militia began to assemble, Governor Dunmore would now
begin active operations against the local militia companies. On October 12,
1775, Captain Samuel Leslie ascended the Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River
and was able to capture and destroy 19 cannon concealed in a wood. Just five
days later, the Governor, with a party of grenadiers, sailors and marines,
sailed up the Eastern Branch of the Elizabeth River to Newton, where he landed
and marched on Kemps Landing. The Colonial militia was in flight and the
British, after breaking open the stores and taking off some small arms,
returned unharmed to their ships. On the night of October 19, 1775, 39 men
landed at Norfolk and marched out into the surrounding countryside and were
able to seize 20 cannon.[14]
After the threat of burning Hampton was made, on October 24, 1775 the Committee
of Safety had placed Colonel William Woodford and his 2nd Virginia Regiment on
alert in Williamsburg and had attached five companies from the Culpeper Minute
Battalion. This combined force was then ordered to the area of Norfolk and
Portsmouth. Meanwhile, one of the British tenders, under the command of Captain
Squire, was driven into a bank during a storm not far from Hampton. Some of the
crew were captured and then later released, however, the citizens of Hampton
took possession of the tender's armaments and burned what was left of the
craft. On the night of October 25, 1775, Captain Squire landed some of his men
east of Hampton and looted a number of houses, however, on the next morning,
the captain and his squadron appeared off the mouth of Hampton Creek. After
having to leave his sloop, Otter, behind, Captain Squire arrived at his large
schooner and declared his mission to the people of Hampton, which was the
return of all materials that belonged to one of his tenders. However, the
citizens of Hampton believed that his true mission was to set fire to the town
and he could not attempt to land troops until the channel could be cleared of
debris. What followed next was an indecisive exchange of cannon and musket
fire.[15]
On that same night of October 26, 1775, news of the British attacked reached
Williamsburg around 2000 and 2100. The Committee of Safety ordered Colonel
Woodford to Hampton with Captain Abraham Buford and his Culpeper Riflemen using
horses that were borrowed from the citizens of Williamsburg. They rode all
night through heavy rain, covering about 36 miles in less than 12 hours,
arriving around 0800 and 0900 on the morning of 27 October 1775. While Colonel
Woodford was riding to Hampton, Captain Squire's men had been cutting through
the sunken vessels and his flotilla was now broadside to Hampton and initiated
their bombardment.[16]
Now that Colonel Woodford was on the scene, he began stationing troops inside
some of the abandoned houses, along the banks of the creek hidden by fences,
trees and rocks. While Captain Squire had his barrage underway, he thought that
once he started raking the houses and streets with his cannon the patriots
would run. Instead, the militia already present was being reinforced with
Culpeper Minutemen, famed for their accuracy in shooting. The largest cannon
that Captain Squire had were 4-pounders and they proved to be useless against
the well-built brick homes that housed the riflemen, who were now shooting
rifles at his vessels. The fire from the riflemen was so effective that they
were bringing down every British sailor in sight. Aboard the schooner that
Captain Squire commanded, his sailors were unable to man their 4-pounders.[17]
Due to the accurate rifle fire of the Americans, Captain Squire's situation was
becoming untenable. For his men attempting to serve the ship's cannon meant
certain death or injury. As he began to realize, Captain Squire's flotilla was
now being outgunned by rifle fire from the shore and his guns were gradually
becoming silent and he was forced to withdraw. As he began the withdrawal, one
of his tenders, the Hawke, began drifting towards the shore. Once again due to
precise rifle fire, the British sailors were not able to man the tender
properly and ran aground. The Hawke was captured along with its crew and
armament, ending the Battle of Hampton and the first shooting engagement
between Governor Dunmore and the American patriots.[18]
Now that the British had retreated to Norfolk, Governor Dunmore ordered the
creation of batteries and entrenchments around Norfolk as well as the arming of
slaves and Tories. On November 7, 1775, Governor Dunmore aroused the anger of
the Virginia colony by issuing a proclamation declaring martial law, summoning
the people to the flag of Great Britain, offering freedom to all slaves who
belonged to the patriots and would take up arms for the king.[19] Governor
Dunmore understood that such an act would have a wide-ranging effect. Not only
would it interrupt production, it was also feed the growing terror among the
colonists of armed slave revolt and point out an inherent contradiction of
Colonists preaching liberty.[20] Planters would be diverted from waging war
against Britain by the necessity of protecting their families and property from
an internal threat. At the same time, Governor Dunmore's own force of 300
soldiers, seamen and loyalist recruits, cut off from the aid of British troops
in Boston, would be reinforced by black fighting men and laborers. By using
these slaves as support, Governor Dunmore would induct them into his Ethiopian
Regiment, consisting of 300 slaves, which were armed and outfitted in military
uniforms inscribed with the words "Liberty to Slaves."[21]
The response from the colonists was instant. Newspapers published the entire
proclamation and patrols on land and water were intensified. Throughout the
colonies, restrictions on slave meetings were tightened. The Virginia Gazette
warned slaves to not be tempted by the proclamation and urged them to remain
with their masters, citing the fact that Governor Dunmore was also a
slaveholder. Although no more than 800 slaves really succeeded in reaching
Governor Dunmore's lines, word of the proclamation inspired as many as 100,000
to risk all in an attempt to be free.[22]
While the colony was in an uproar over the Governor's proclamation, Colonel
Woodford was moving his men from Hampton toward Norfolk by a circuitous route
up the James River and crossing over to Suffolk. At the same time, Joseph
Hutchings and Anthony Lawson were recruiting in Princess Anne County and with
about 170 men, they were marching to meet and join Colonel Woodford.[23] When
Governor Dunmore received news of this activity, he was able to muster 200
soldiers, marines and a few Norfolk Tories, due to a reinforcement of 60 men
from St. Augustine, Florida, and he set out for Kemp's Landing.[24] Once there,
Governor Dunmore set up his standard and issued his proclamation, declaring
those who took up arms against the Crown rebels. He also called on all slaves,
servants and apprentices to rally to him and receive arms.
On November 16, 1775, as Governor Dunmore moved his regulars and recruits
toward North Landing, he encountered the Princess Anne militia that Joseph
Hutchings and Anthony Lawson led. With their superior numbers, the British
overwhelmed the Patriots who, after firing one volley and suffering casualties,
fled the field and scattered into the swamps. The British captured Hutchings
and Lawson, took them to Norfolk and imprisoned them aboard the schooner Thomas.
Upon entering the village, Governor Dunmore set up his standard and summoned
the people to take the oath of allegiance.[25]
After the Battle of Kemp's Landing, Governor Dunmore learned that the Virginia
Second Regiment was on its way to Norfolk and he began hearing please from the
Tories in Norfolk for him to bring his troops ashore for their protection. This
plea combined with the summons from the Patriots for Andrew Sprowle to attend
the Committee of Public Safety in order to answer charges of housing his
Majesty's troops at Gosport. These pieces of information provoked Governor
Dunmore to focus on his defenses for the Norfolk area, which he did by laying
out a plan of fortification for the town, as well as initiating the
construction of fortifications.[26]
Through this decision, Governor Dunmore made a mistake. Norfolk's real strength
against an overland attack lay in its lone, lengthy, and circuitous route. Had
the British devoted all their energies to erecting works at Bachelor's Mill on
the edge of the swamp and at Great Bridge, it is probable that the Virginia
troops would have never gotten within sight of Norfolk. It is at this last
possible moment that Governor Dunmore realized the situation he was about to
put himself in and hastily sent some of his troops to begin fortifying Great
Bridge.[27]
Now that the American and British forces recognized the strategic location of
the Great Bridge, each had a clear objective in its determination toward
controlling it. The British knew that they could not last in water-bound
Norfolk or on their ships in the harbor without supplies that came through
Great Bridge. The Americans sought to break this line of supply to the British;
however, they also knew that without naval power, their only hope of expelling
the British from Norfolk had to be by land.
Once Governor Dunmore ordered Great Bridge to be fortified, it became known
that this place possessed great natural strength. The Southern Branch of the
Elizabeth River flowed here between marshes, extending 150 yards or more on
either side. From the northern side a long causeway crossed the marsh to a firm
footing on an island, where a wooden bridge 40 feet in length had been placed
over the stream to a similar island on the other bank. This island was
connected to Great Bridge by another long causeway over the marsh on the
southern side. On the northern island, the British hastily built Fort Murray,
named after Governor John Murray, Earl of Dunmore, and had placed four-pounder
cannons to cover the bridge and both causeways[28] and manned the fort with 27
men of the 14th Regiment of Foot.[29]
Once the Virginians arrived at Great Bridge on December 2, 1775, they
constructed breastworks across the southern end of the causeway, which they
manned lightly, situating the main force in the village further south. The
matter of entrenching was left to Adjutant General Thomas Bullitt, who was a
staff officer that had some practical experience in military engineering. At
the southern causeway he directed the construction of a breastwork in the form
of a sagging M for effective crossfire that was seven feet in height and 150
feet in length, with mounting platforms and loopholes. On a firm,
peninsula-like projection of land west of the village he constructed two
earthworks for batteries when cannon could be made available.[30] To face the
British across the causeway, Colonel William Woodford brought the Second
Virginia Regiment, which included the Minutemen of Culpeper County, and 200 men
from Fauquier and Orange Counties.[31] The total American force that assembled
in the Great Bridge area totaled approximately 1,000 men.[32]
Over the next several days, there was a constant exchange of gunfire. Some
small skirmishes occurred, which resulted in the British burning five of the
seven buildings located on the southern causeway in order for them to get a
better field of view. During these days of skirmishing, the Americans were
waiting for reinforcements from North Carolina under Colonel Robert Howe. It is
during these pivotal days that the British decided to take the initiative. This
decision by Governor Dunmore came about from his experience in dealing with the
Colonial militia at Kemp's Landing, where he remembered how the militia had
fled and assumed that the Culpeper Minutemen would do the same.[33] His other
reason lies with the misinformation that was received from a well-coached
servant belonging to Major Thomas Marshall. This servant was described as a
deserter who informed the British that there were only 300 Colonial militia in
Great Bridge and several hundred more militia bringing artillery pieces were
being expected from North Carolina.[34]
Now that Governor Dunmore was armed with these pieces of information, he
ordered his troops to attack Colonel Woodford's position. Even though this
decision went against the more experienced judgment of his officers, Governor
Dunmore directed Captain Samuel Leslie to make preparations. On the night of
December 8, 1775, Captain Leslie moved his command out of Norfolk and arrived
undetected at Fort Murray around 0330. The troops that went with Captain Leslie
was all of the 14th Regiment of Foot that Governor Dunmore had available, which
included the Grenadier and light companies that totaled 121 rank and file, 32
officers and Captain Matthew Squire had also sent a detachment of gunners to
man two cannon. Add to this about 60 Tory volunteers and the troops already
present in Fort Murray for a combined force of about 672 men.[35]
When the British troops arrived at Fort Murray, they rested for two hours and
the officers decided that the objective before them was not as simple as they
thought. What they realized was that directly past the fort was the bridge and
immediately beyond the bridge were the Virginian's defenses, with the bridge
only wide enough to allow the men to march six abreast.[36] At dawn on December
9, 1775, Captain Leslie ordered the light troops out of the fort in order to
replace the planks that had been removed from the bridge. After crossing the
northern causeway and running into Colonial pickets, they set fire to the
remaining buildings.[37] At this time, Captain Squire's gunners wheeled the two
cannon to the bridge, where a natural bend in the road allowed the cannon to
rake the Virginian's defenses without endangering the attacking force.[38]
While the British were replacing the bridge planking, reveille was sounded in
the Virginian's camp. As it became customary to exchange a few shots with each
other at dawn, Colonel Woodford and Major Alexander Spotswood assumed the
gunfire to be part of the morning's usual activities. Even before a messenger
from the breastworks could find them, they heard some of their men shouting to
the others to stand to their arms. After quickly equipping themselves, the two
officers rushed out of their tent to see that the British had begun their
assault. After rallying 40 riflemen, Colonel Woodford rushed down to the
breastwork.[39]
In the breastwork, Lieutenant Edward Travis was in command of about 61 men. He
could see the British advance guard coming through the dense smoke from the
burning buildings and behind it followed the Grenadier Company led by Captain
Charles Fordyce. Behind Captain Fordyce came Captain Leslie with over 300
Tories and former slaves who halted behind the cannon waiting for their chance
to exploit any breakthrough in the Virginian's defenses once the Grenadiers had
broken through.[40]
Due to the narrow causeway, the British advanced only six abreast in perfect
parade formation. They alternated firing volleys by platoons, pausing only to
reload. Up to this point, the Virginians produced an accurate but sporadic fire
against the British, taking a toll upon the British, forcing their formation to
waver. Captain Fordyce, after rallying his men and assuming that the day could
be won, initiated their charge upon the Virginian's defenses; however, unknown
to Captain Fordyce, Colonel Woodford's riflemen had now reinforced the troops
already at hand within the fortifications. Lieutenant Travis ordered his men to
reload and hold their fire until the enemy was within 50 yards. The command to
open fire was now given and within 15 feet of the Virginian's defenses, Captain
Fordyce went down, being shot by no less than 14 bullets. Twelve Grenadiers
fell dead in the volley, with nineteen wounded. With their commander dead, the
regulars broke formation, dragging their dead and wounded back to the bridge.
At this point, the Virginians began pouring out of the entrenchments collecting
the British wounded and taking them back to their camp.[41]
Even while the British wounded were being gathered, one offensive maneuver on
the part of the Virginians was to be made. Lieutenant Colonel Edward Stevens,
of the Culpeper Minutemen, led a dash of 100 men, mainly riflemen, to the
battery entrenchments on the eastern peninsula. Captain Leslie's position was
now compromised and the sharpshooters began picking off Tories and former
slaves off of the bridge. Now, Captain Leslie was forced to withdraw his men
and cannon into Fort Murray.[42]
With the Battle of Great Bridge essentially over, after lasting for about 30
minutes, the number of British casualties is not exactly known. It is estimated
that the British lost 102 men, either killed or wounded.[43] As for the
Virginians, it was truly remarkable that only one was wounded, a Lieutenant
Thomas Nash of the Norfolk County Militia who suffered a slight wound in his
hand.[44]
The victory won by the triumphant Virginians at the Battle of Great Bridge was
a decisive one. With the British regulars cut to pieces and the Tories and
former slaves being demoralized, it was no longer possible to hold Fort Murray,
which resulted in the British abandoning the fort on the evening of December 9,
1775. Now that the route had been secured between the colonies of North
Carolina and Virginia, the road to Norfolk was now open. With this victory, it
encouraged the Virginia Convention to issue a counter-proclamation to Governor
Dunmore's proclamation, where the convention offered full pardons to the Royal
Ethiopian Regiment if they threw down their arms and surrendered to Colonel
Woodford.
This battle, although brief, was the first decisive battle fought in the South.
It led to the destruction of Norfolk in January of 1776, which was a necessary
decision in order to break the strength of the town's Loyalist sympathizers.
The Virginian victory was a major step in eliminating British supply lines,
which forced Governor Dunmore to abandon the south side of the Chesapeake Bay
in the spring of 1776. This abandonment meant that the British would not be
able to utilize Norfolk as a major base of operations. This battle had also
pointed out that volunteer soldiers and militia had withstood a cannon
supported attack against some of the finest professional soldiers in the world
and virtually annihilated them. It is also one battle in the American
Revolution where the rifleman played a very important role. After the battle,
it became impossible for Governor Dunmore to get any assistance from those
still loyal to the crown or slaves that he sought after to turn against the
colony. The Battle of Great Bridge demonstrated the resolve and resourcefulness
of Virginia's citizens. However, the nation would yet again see the fighting
abilities of Virginia's sons in action yet again in the nation's bloodiest
conflict, the War Between the States, where Virginians were called out once
again to defend the Old Dominion.
Show Footnotes and
Bibliography
Footnotes
[1]. Wingo, Elizabeth B., Hanbury, Elizabeth B. 1964. The Battle of Great
Bridge. Virginia: Chesapeake Public Schools Printing Department
[2]. Ibid.
[3]. Ibid.
[4]. Ibid.
[5]. Ibid.
[6]. Wertenbaker, Thomas J. and Schlegel. Norfolk, Historic Southern Port.
Tennessee: Kingsport Press, Inc.
[7]. Ibid.
[8]. Ibid.
[9]. Wingo, Elizabeth B., Hanbury, Elizabeth B. 1964. The Battle of Great
Bridge. Virginia: Chesapeake Public Schools Printing Department
[10]. Ibid.
[11]. Ibid.
[12]. Wertenbaker, Thomas J. and Schlegel. Norfolk, Historic Southern Port.
Tennessee: Kingsport Press, Inc.
[13]. Ibid.
[14]. Ibid.
[15]. Willyard, Kyle.2004. Hampton, Va. On-line. Available from
Internet at http://patriot.net/~tpost/hampton.html, accessed on 15 May 2006.
[16]. Ibid.
[17]. Ibid.
[18]. Ibid.
[19]. Wingo, Elizabeth B., Hanbury, Elizabeth B. 1964. The Battle of Great
Bridge. Virginia: Chesapeake Public Schools Printing Department
[20]. McCabe, Robert. 2004. Battle of Great Bridge ignored, scholar says.
The Virginian-Pilot, 04 December 2004.
[21]. PBS. Proclamation of Earl of Dunmore. On-line. Available from
Internet at http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part2/2h42.html, accessed on 12 June
2006.
[22]. Ibid.
[23]. Wingo, Elizabeth B., Hanbury, Elizabeth B. 1964. The Battle of Great
Bridge. Virginia: Chesapeake Public Schools Printing Department
[24]. Wertenbaker, Thomas J. and Schlegel. Norfolk, Historic Southern Port.
Tennessee: Kingsport Press, Inc.
[25]. Ibid.
[26]. Wingo, Elizabeth B., Hanbury, Elizabeth B. 1964. The Battle of Great
Bridge. Virginia: Chesapeake Public Schools Printing Department
[27]. Wertenbaker, Thomas J. and Schlegel. Norfolk, Historic Southern Port.
Tennessee: Kingsport Press, Inc.
[28]. Willyard, Kyle. 2004. The Battle of Great Bridge. On-line.
Available from Internet
http://www.continentalline.org/articles/0003/000301.htm, accessed on 25 May
2006.
[29]. Wingo, Elizabeth B., Hanbury, Elizabeth B. 1964. The Battle of Great
Bridge. Virginia: Chesapeake Public Schools Printing Department
[30]. Willyard, Kyle. 2004. The Battle of Great Bridge. On-line.
Available from Internet
http://www.continentalline.org/articles/0003/000301.htm, accessed on 25 May
2006.
[31]. Wingo, Elizabeth B., Hanbury, Elizabeth B. 1964. The Battle of Great
Bridge. Virginia: Chesapeake Public Schools Printing Department
[32]. The American Revolution. Battle of Great Bridge.On-line.Available on
Internet http://www.americanrevolution.com/BattleofGreatBridge.htm, accessed on
25 May 2006.
[33]. Wertenbaker, Thomas J. and Schlegel. Norfolk, Historic Southern Port.
Tennessee: Kingsport Press, Inc.
[34]. Wingo, Elizabeth B., Hanbury, Elizabeth B. 1964. The Battle of Great
Bridge. Virginia: Chesapeake Public Schools Printing Department
[35]. Willyard, Kyle. 2004. The Battle of Great Bridge. On-line. Available from
Internet http://www.continentalline.org/articles/0003/000301.htm, accessed on
25 May 2006.
[36]. Wingo, Elizabeth B., Hanbury, Elizabeth B. 1964. The Battle of Great
Bridge. Virginia: Chesapeake Public Schools Printing Department
[37]. Lossing, Benson J. 1850. Pictorial Field Book of the Revolution. On-line.
Available from Internet
http://freepages.history.rootsweb.com/~wcarr1/Lossing1/Contents2.html, accessed
on 25 May 2006.
[38]. Willyard, Kyle. 2004. The Battle of Great Bridge. On-line. Available from
Internet http://www.continentalline.org/articles/0003/000301.htm, accessed on
25 May 2006.
[39]. Ibid.
[40]. Ibid.
[41]. Ibid.
[42]. Ibid.
[43]. The American Revolution. Battle of Great Bridge. On-line.Available
on Internet http://www.americanrevolution.com/BattleofGreatBridge.htm, accessed
on 25 May 2006.
[44]. Wingo, Elizabeth B., Hanbury, Elizabeth B. 1964. The Battle of Great
Bridge. Virginia: Chesapeake Public Schools Printing Department
Bibliography
The American Revolution. Battle of Great Bridge. On-line. Available
from Internet at http://www.americanrevolution.com/BattleofGreatBridge.htm,
accessed on 25 May 2006.
Commager, Henry S., Morris, Richard B. 1958. The Spirit of Seventy-Six; The
Story of the American Revolution as told by Participants. New York: Da
Capo Press
Culpeper, A Great Town on the Blue Ridge. The Battle of Great Bridge. On-line.
Available from Internet at
http://www.fortunecity.com/skyscraper/carlton/1069/FRAMESETculppage.html,
accessed on 15 May 2006.
Lossing, Benson J. 1850. Pictorial Field Book of the Revolution. On-line.
Available from internet at
http://freepages.history.rootsweb.com/~wcarr1/Lossing1/Contents2.html, accessed
on 25 May 2006.
McCabe, Robert. 2004. Battle of Great Bridge ignored, scholar says.
The Virginian-Pilot, 04 December 2004.
Public Broadcasting Service. Proclamation of Earl of Dunmore. On-line.
Available from Internet at http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part2/2h42.html,
accessed on 12 June 2006.
Tucker, George H. Norfolk Highlights 1584-1881. On-line. Available
from Internet at http://www.norfolkhistorical.org/highlights/contents.html,
accessed on 15 May 2006.
Wertenbaker, Thomas J. and Schlegel. Norfolk, Historic Southern Port. Tennessee:
Kingsport Press, Inc.
Willyard, Kyle. 2004. The Battle of Great Bridge. On-line. Available
from Internet at http://www.continentalline.org/articles/0003/000301.htm,
accessed on 25 May 2006.
Willyard, Kyle.2004. Hampton, Va. On-line. Available from Internet at
http://patriot.net/~tpost/hampton.html, accessed on 15 May 2006.
Willyard, Kyle. 2004. Norfolk, Va. On-line. Available from Internet at
http://patriot.net/~tpost/norfolk.html, accessed on 15 May 2006.
Wingo, Elizabeth B., Hanbury, Elizabeth B. 1964. The Battle of Great Bridge.
Virginia: Chesapeake Public Schools Printing Department
Copyright © 2007 Richard Podruchny
Written by Richard Podruchny. If you have questions or comments on this article,
please contact Richard Podruchny at:
podruchnyrmr@aol.com.
About the author:
Richard Podruchny is currently an active duty member of the USAF for the last 14 years.
Over those 14 years, I have been stationed or deployed in the United Kingdom, Turkey, South Korea, Iraq,
Saudi Arabia, Texas, Virginia, and Alaska. As of lately, I'm an instructor for our Combat Targeting Course
where we teach our students, both officer and enlisted, the doctrine and methods through which the Air Forces
wields Air Power. I have been married for the last 10 years and my wife and I have two beautiful children,
an 8 year old daughter and a 5 year old son.
Published online: 01/13/2007.
* Views expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent
those of MHO. |